 |
|
misc.legal - 23 new messages in 13 topics - digest
misc.legal http://groups.google.com/group/misc.legal?hl=en misc.legal@goog... Today's topics: * AARP FALLS FROM GRACE - 1 messages, 1 author http://groups.google.com/group/misc.legal/t/ec1347e23044cbda?hl=en * Bob Officer wimp thinks his posts will be removed - 1 messages, 1 author http://groups.google.com/group/misc.legal/t/b0ddab2a60a7826f?hl=en * Discount Nike Shox TL 2 Shoes Store (www.cntrade09.com ) - 1 messages, 1 author http://groups.google.com/group/misc.legal/t/bd4fcb6147cc5625?hl=en * Can citizens detain for ICE illegal aliens (citizens arrest)? - 2 messages, 1 author http://groups.google.com/group/misc.legal/t/bc5d4e5fd192f7ba?hl=en * ADOPTED Son says Hennepin County ignored his claims of hidden camera in home - 1 messages, 1 author http://groups.google.com/group/misc.legal/t/757777d622ecb599?hl=en * Daniel J Sullivan III of Patchogue, NY - 1 messages, 1 author http://groups.google.com/group/misc.legal/t/c344db2df458ad1d?hl=en * How were your quotes misconstrued, Dan? - 1 messages, 1 author http://groups.google.com/group/misc.legal/t/7ab0ad66ae4ae3b9?hl=en * If Novins is Smart He'll Appeal the Unjust Decision - 7 messages, 5 authors http://groups.google.com/group/misc.legal/t/a6b6a1dcde3937de?hl=en * Can my friend's potential employers find out online that she was arrested for these two crimes, even though she wasn't convicted and that she used to call the cops on her husband for domestic disturbance (maybe even for beating her, I'm not sure)? - 1 messages, 1 author http://groups.google.com/group/misc.legal/t/b0f9a9944a25cf40?hl=en * Children born to non-US citizens could be barred from American birth certificates - 3 messages, 3 authors http://groups.google.com/group/misc.legal/t/903d072e5afd3e10?hl=en * Children born to non-US citizens could be barred from American birth certificates - No mas ANCHOR BABIES - 2 messages, 2 authors http://groups.google.com/group/misc.legal/t/c8dbc790223a7b72?hl=en * Does this govt ruling violate the First Amendment right to free speech? - 1 messages, 1 author http://groups.google.com/group/misc.legal/t/952eb0d0c6979da1?hl=en * get kelp - 1 messages, 1 author http://groups.google.com/group/misc.legal/t/2e81cbc61ca760bc?hl=en ============================================================================== TOPIC: AARP FALLS FROM GRACE http://groups.google.com/group/misc.legal/t/ec1347e23044cbda?hl=en ============================================================================== == 1 of 1 == Date: Mon, Jun 14 2010 11:22 pm From: mg > > Once upon a time . . . Yup, that's what this post is. It's one very long fairy tale. After awhile, you can almost smell these right wing posts a mile away. ============================================================================== TOPIC: Bob Officer wimp thinks his posts will be removed http://groups.google.com/group/misc.legal/t/b0ddab2a60a7826f?hl=en ============================================================================== == 1 of 1 == Date: Tues, Jun 15 2010 12:59 am From: "Hunter" "Peter Bitch" < <> > wrote in message news:4c16cfa0@news...... > Ralphie boy, I KF'd him rather than replying to him in a fashion that was > similar to his and perhaps a lot stronger. KF is the way of a coward. The real reason you punted is because you were getting you ass thoroughly kicked and cried, "NO MAS!" Bitch bitch bitch..... Peter the Wimpy Bitch! WWAAAHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAA! ============================================================================== TOPIC: Discount Nike Shox TL 2 Shoes Store (www.cntrade09.com ) http://groups.google.com/group/misc.legal/t/bd4fcb6147cc5625?hl=en ============================================================================== == 1 of 1 == Date: Tues, Jun 15 2010 1:48 am From: cntrade08 www.cntrade09.com -----wholesale 2010 brand shoes - Gucci shoes - Gucci leather shoes - Gucci sandals - Polo shoes - BALLY shoes - bikkembergs shoes - BVRBERRY sandals - CL miumiu shoes - CL sandals - COCAH boots - COLE HAAN shoes - DG shoes - Dior shoes - FENDI shoes - HOGAN shoes - LOUIS VUITTON sandals - LV shoes - LV slippers - MUNICH shoes - PRADA shoes - TODS shoes - Chanel sandals - TORY BURCH shoes Sneaker, Shoes - Air Jordan Shoes - Jordan high heels - Air max shoes - Nike shox shoes - Air force one shoes - Nike dunk shoes - vibram shoes Clothes - Men's jeans - women's jeans - Men's Shorts - women's shorts - Men's T-shirts - women's T-shirts Thai version of soccer football clothing - Club - National team Football clothes series - Soccer long sleeve suit - 2010 Soccer World Cup National team - Football Peripherals - football clothes kids - Club - National team Air max shoes - Air Max 1 Premium KID Products - T-shirts Hair straightener,Hair curler - GHD - CHI Handbags ,wallets - women's handbags - men's handbags website: http://www.cntrade09.com Discount Nike Air Max Tn 6 Supply (www.cntrade09.com ) Discount Nike Shox NZ Shoes Supply (www.cntrade09.com ) Discount Nike Shox OZ Sale (www.cntrade09.com ) Discount Nike Shox TL Store (www.cntrade09.com ) Discount Nike Shox TL 2 Shoes Store (www.cntrade09.com ) Discount Nike Shox TL 3 Distributor (www.cntrade09.com ) Discount Nike Shox Bmw Shoes Distributor (www.cntrade09.com ) Discount Nike Shox Elite Shoes Manufacturer (www.cntrade09.com ) Discount Nike Shox Monster Manufacturer (www.cntrade09.com ) Discount Nike Shox R4 Running Shoes (www.cntrade09.com ) Discount Nike Shox R5 Mens Shoes (www.cntrade09.com ) Discount Nike Shox Ride Womens Shoes (www.cntrade09.com ) Discount Nike Shox Rival Shoes Wholesaler (www.cntrade09.com ) Discount Nike Shox Energia Wholesaler (www.cntrade09.com ) Discount Nike Shox LV Sneaker (www.cntrade09.com ) Discount Nike Shox Turbo Suppliers (www.cntrade09.com ) Discount Nike Shox Classic Shoes Suppliers (www.cntrade09.com ) ============================================================================== TOPIC: Can citizens detain for ICE illegal aliens (citizens arrest)? http://groups.google.com/group/misc.legal/t/bc5d4e5fd192f7ba?hl=en ============================================================================== == 1 of 2 == Date: Tues, Jun 15 2010 2:15 am From: Kent Wills At one time, not so long ago, rfischer@soni... (Ray Fischer) wrote: >Kent Wills <compuelf@gmai...> wrote: >>At one time, not so long ago, rfischer@soni... (Ray Fischer) wrote: >> >>>Kent Wills <compuelf@gmai...> wrote: >>>> rfischer@soni... (Ray Fischer) wrote: >>> >>>>>>>>> Do you _like_ being a stupid asshole? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Maybe you should put the rest of the text back in, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Maybe you shouldn't be a moron who thinks that progrms that ended in >>>>>>> 1964 have something to do with programs that exist now. >>>>>> >>>>>>And maybe you are a moron that keeps ignoring the examples provided to you. >>>>>>Specifically the H1B visa system and the H2A visa system. >>>>> >>>>>Like pretendng that the H1B visa program is relevant to unskilled farm >>>>>workers, asshole? >>>> >>>> You are the only one trying to make any such connection. Scout >>>>certainly didn't. >>> >>>That is, of course, patent bullshit. He most certainly did. >> >> You may call the truth by any term you wish. > >Rightard rule #1: Lie, lie more, lie again, lie about lying. So you're a Rightard. What's that to me, or anyone else? -- Always follow your dream! Unless it's the one where you're at work in your underwear during a fire drill. == 2 of 2 == Date: Tues, Jun 15 2010 2:15 am From: Kent Wills At one time, not so long ago, rfischer@soni... (Ray Fischer) wrote: >Kent Wills <compuelf@gmai...> wrote: >>At one time, not so long ago, rfischer@soni... (Ray Fischer) wrote: >> >>>Kent Wills <compuelf@gmai...> wrote: >>>>At one time, not so long ago, rfischer@soni... (Ray Fischer) wrote: >>>> >>>>[...] >>>> >>>>>>> The way I saw it was that Mr. Scout brought up two programs, H1B and >>>>>>> H2A. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> While neither of these is quite as extensive as the defunct Bracero >>>>>>> program was in its heyday, they still represent programs that allow >>>>>>> non-resident aliens to reside and work in these United States. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Perhaps you would like a more extensive program than currently exists; >>>>>>> I know that many other people do. That would be a reasonable point of >>>>>>> discussion. >>>>>> >>>>>>It certainly would, but either of these programs refutes his claim that no >>>>>>such guest worker program exists, >>>>> >>>>>The rightard idiot thinks that H1B applies to unskilled farm workers. >>>> >>>> You shouldn't be so hard on yourself, Ray. >>> >>>You're not smart enough to be a condescending asshole. >>> >>>Not by a long shot. >> >> Based on your posts, I'm clearly your intellectual superior. > >Based on your posts you're a lying coward and hypocrite. Yet I've not lied, am standing up to you (metaphorically, of course), and hold my standards to myself as well as others. Care to try another lie, Rightard? -- Sanza speme vivemo in disio. ============================================================================== TOPIC: ADOPTED Son says Hennepin County ignored his claims of hidden camera in home http://groups.google.com/group/misc.legal/t/757777d622ecb599?hl=en ============================================================================== == 1 of 1 == Date: Tues, Jun 15 2010 2:16 am From: Kent Wills At one time, not so long ago, ex-con (one conviction for OWI and TWO convictions for BEATING his ex-wife), child abuser and self confessed user and abuser of illegal drugs, Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson <greegor47@gmai...> wrote: >69.255.48.21 WOODBRIDGE VIRGINIA COMCAST >Kyle Schwitters AKA Sigmund Fraud AKA Lil Obwon AKA >Fenimore Cooper AKA ChristsNemesis AKA ToptheWop > AKA theloneranger100 <slipuvalad at yahoo.com> wrote: > >> "There's something to be said for viewing a boy executing a shit." >> -- Mark Twain, 1908 > >Was Clemens advocating voyeurism or was >he pointing out that there are comments to >be made about almost anything? > >Based on some of your other posts it >looks like you'd advocate kid porn by >presuming the former rather than the latter. Why not entertain him with tales of your sexual molestation of Lisa Watkins' daughter who was six or seven years old at the time, Greg? Point out how you fondled the child's genital area with your bare hand. Also explain how when she got out of the shower, she looked like a dairy Queen treat in your eyes. A select number of items that really are about Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson (either directly or through the same standards he DEMANDS be held to others): Title: ST VS GREGORY HANSON (DOB 05/22/1959) CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 04/10/1996 Comments: CT 1 OWI 1ST OTHER CITATION 04/10/1996 Comments: CT 2 SPEED Disposition Status GUILTY PLEA/DEFAULT "That's the chick, but not the pic, zipperhead!" Greg "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson proving his bigotry towards Asians, by attacking my first wife (deceased). http://www.rsdb.org/search?q=zipperhead Me: "I suspect your stalking is due to the use and abuse of illegal drugs, Greg. Is the reason for your stalking the members of alt.friends due to the use and abuse of illegal drugs? Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson, wife beater and child abuser: "Of course." "My family's case is for Neglect, but we are treated in virtually every regard as child abusers, marked on the Child Abuse registry, for example." -- Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson, wife beater and child abuser As of Saturday, March 27, 2010: SMALL CLAIMS ORIGINAL NOTICE Comments: OPA $2805.04 COPIES TO PA VERIFICATION OF ACCOUNT JUDGEMENT DEFAULT Comments: JUDGMENT AGAINST GREGORY HANSON FOR $2805.04 + INTEREST AT 7.271% FROM 8/6/98 & $45.00 COSTS. Comments: NOTE OF GARN/NOTE TO DEFT SERV 9/24/98 BY WCSD TO SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT (ED POLKERS) FOR GREG HANSON FEES $35.60 Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson has a Garnishment order against him from Ed Polkers. There is nothing to even suggest any of the money legally owed has been paid. The SoL on the order has likely expired, but Greg still can't risk getting a job due to it. As of Saturday, March 27, 2010: Financials Title: STATE OF IOWA VS HANSON, GREG SCOTT Case: 06571 AGCR015216 (LINN) Citation Number: Summary Orig Paid Due COSTS 9200.00 850.00 8350.00 FINE 500.00 500.00 0.00 SURCHARGE 150.00 150.00 0.00 RESTITUTION 0.00 0.00 0.00 OTHER 0.00 0.00 0.00 $9850.00 $1500.00 $8350.00 Yes, Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson still owes over $8000.00 related to his convictions for BEATING his ex-wife. Me: Hey, he used your standards. Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson: It's textbook psychopathic reasoning. Greg admitting his standards are psychopathic. ============================================================================== TOPIC: Daniel J Sullivan III of Patchogue, NY http://groups.google.com/group/misc.legal/t/c344db2df458ad1d?hl=en ============================================================================== == 1 of 1 == Date: Tues, Jun 15 2010 2:17 am From: Kent Wills At one time, not so long ago, ex-con (one conviction for OWI and TWO convictions for BEATING his ex-wife), child abuser and self confessed user and abuser of illegal drugs, Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson <greegor47@gmai...> wrote: >http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/msg/d6fce48597a728cb?hl=en&dmode=source > >KBW > He would have needed to know before >KBW > marriage. One would have to be stupid >KBW > beyond belief not to see the signs before >KBW > marriage was a realistic option in the relationship. > >Dan, If Kent was your attorney, would you fire him? Where does your drug addled mind see a legal matter in my comment? Please be specific. A select number of items that really are about Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson (either directly or through the same standards he DEMANDS be held to others): Title: ST VS GREGORY HANSON (DOB 05/22/1959) CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 04/10/1996 Comments: CT 1 OWI 1ST OTHER CITATION 04/10/1996 Comments: CT 2 SPEED Disposition Status GUILTY PLEA/DEFAULT "That's the chick, but not the pic, zipperhead!" Greg "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson proving his bigotry towards Asians, by attacking my first wife (deceased). http://www.rsdb.org/search?q=zipperhead Me: "I suspect your stalking is due to the use and abuse of illegal drugs, Greg. Is the reason for your stalking the members of alt.friends due to the use and abuse of illegal drugs? Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson, wife beater and child abuser: "Of course." "My family's case is for Neglect, but we are treated in virtually every regard as child abusers, marked on the Child Abuse registry, for example." -- Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson, wife beater and child abuser As of Saturday, March 27, 2010: SMALL CLAIMS ORIGINAL NOTICE Comments: OPA $2805.04 COPIES TO PA VERIFICATION OF ACCOUNT JUDGEMENT DEFAULT Comments: JUDGMENT AGAINST GREGORY HANSON FOR $2805.04 + INTEREST AT 7.271% FROM 8/6/98 & $45.00 COSTS. Comments: NOTE OF GARN/NOTE TO DEFT SERV 9/24/98 BY WCSD TO SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT (ED POLKERS) FOR GREG HANSON FEES $35.60 Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson has a Garnishment order against him from Ed Polkers. There is nothing to even suggest any of the money legally owed has been paid. The SoL on the order has likely expired, but Greg still can't risk getting a job due to it. As of Saturday, March 27, 2010: Financials Title: STATE OF IOWA VS HANSON, GREG SCOTT Case: 06571 AGCR015216 (LINN) Citation Number: Summary Orig Paid Due COSTS 9200.00 850.00 8350.00 FINE 500.00 500.00 0.00 SURCHARGE 150.00 150.00 0.00 RESTITUTION 0.00 0.00 0.00 OTHER 0.00 0.00 0.00 $9850.00 $1500.00 $8350.00 Yes, Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson still owes over $8000.00 related to his convictions for BEATING his ex-wife. Me: Hey, he used your standards. Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson: It's textbook psychopathic reasoning. Greg admitting his standards are psychopathic. ============================================================================== TOPIC: How were your quotes misconstrued, Dan? http://groups.google.com/group/misc.legal/t/7ab0ad66ae4ae3b9?hl=en ============================================================================== == 1 of 1 == Date: Tues, Jun 15 2010 2:17 am From: Kent Wills At one time, not so long ago, ex-con (one conviction for OWI and TWO convictions for BEATING his ex-wife), child abuser and self confessed user and abuser of illegal drugs, Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson <greegor47@gmai...> wrote: >G > What part of these quotes do you think has >G > been misconstrued, Dan? > >Dan? Is there a SPECIFIC reason your drug addled mind is forcing you to ask a question already answered? A select number of items that really are about Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson (either directly or through the same standards he DEMANDS be held to others): Title: ST VS GREGORY HANSON (DOB 05/22/1959) CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 04/10/1996 Comments: CT 1 OWI 1ST OTHER CITATION 04/10/1996 Comments: CT 2 SPEED Disposition Status GUILTY PLEA/DEFAULT "That's the chick, but not the pic, zipperhead!" Greg "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson proving his bigotry towards Asians, by attacking my first wife (deceased). http://www.rsdb.org/search?q=zipperhead Me: "I suspect your stalking is due to the use and abuse of illegal drugs, Greg. Is the reason for your stalking the members of alt.friends due to the use and abuse of illegal drugs? Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson, wife beater and child abuser: "Of course." "My family's case is for Neglect, but we are treated in virtually every regard as child abusers, marked on the Child Abuse registry, for example." -- Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson, wife beater and child abuser As of Saturday, March 27, 2010: SMALL CLAIMS ORIGINAL NOTICE Comments: OPA $2805.04 COPIES TO PA VERIFICATION OF ACCOUNT JUDGEMENT DEFAULT Comments: JUDGMENT AGAINST GREGORY HANSON FOR $2805.04 + INTEREST AT 7.271% FROM 8/6/98 & $45.00 COSTS. Comments: NOTE OF GARN/NOTE TO DEFT SERV 9/24/98 BY WCSD TO SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT (ED POLKERS) FOR GREG HANSON FEES $35.60 Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson has a Garnishment order against him from Ed Polkers. There is nothing to even suggest any of the money legally owed has been paid. The SoL on the order has likely expired, but Greg still can't risk getting a job due to it. As of Saturday, March 27, 2010: Financials Title: STATE OF IOWA VS HANSON, GREG SCOTT Case: 06571 AGCR015216 (LINN) Citation Number: Summary Orig Paid Due COSTS 9200.00 850.00 8350.00 FINE 500.00 500.00 0.00 SURCHARGE 150.00 150.00 0.00 RESTITUTION 0.00 0.00 0.00 OTHER 0.00 0.00 0.00 $9850.00 $1500.00 $8350.00 Yes, Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson still owes over $8000.00 related to his convictions for BEATING his ex-wife. Me: Hey, he used your standards. Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson: It's textbook psychopathic reasoning. Greg admitting his standards are psychopathic. ============================================================================== TOPIC: If Novins is Smart He'll Appeal the Unjust Decision http://groups.google.com/group/misc.legal/t/a6b6a1dcde3937de?hl=en ============================================================================== == 1 of 7 == Date: Tues, Jun 15 2010 4:56 am From: "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" spooge wrote: > "The Greatest" <honestjohn@cent...> wrote in > news:EJidnYWBYqLKFozRnZ2dnUVZ_hidnZ2d@cent...: <snipped> >> Did he want to know a little information about the same stAUKers >> that called her a "Bunny-Burner" and a "pedophile" ?? The same >> stAUKers that made her life a "living hell" because they sided >> with Rick Mather instead of her ?? Was she not able to answer a >> few questions about these stAUKers and be done with the whole >> matter (no paperwork)......would I risk lawyer fees and bad >> press to "Clam-up" and protect said stAUKers....?? Not my job. Not my obligation. Not something I had the least desire to do. > You seem to be forgetting a couple of things. > > 1) One of the defendants is her spouse Novins originally asked me for information about various people (privately, in email) before Kevin and I were married--this occurred almost immediately after the libelous post was made. As a carrot for my cooperation, he agreed to leave Kevin out of the lawsuit. I declined, which is the reason our friendship ended. Later events were merely the icing on the cake. > 2) The claim is/was bogus as far as the people named as > defendants goes And I told Novins exactly that (to the extent I knew who he planned to name), and he admitted, in a writing to me, that he knew Kevin Cannon was spoofed. >> NEVER.......NOT A CHANCE IN HELL !! > > You have no backbone if you'd cave to the demands of a bully. > > Congratulations. > >> Meat Plow made the right choice and did the right thing......he >> seems to be the only 'AUK' regular with any "horse-sense" !! Apologizing for something one had nothing to do with is nothing short of cowardly. > Nobody has anything to apologize for, doesn't matter what you or > any other kook claims, that's the bottom line. > >> Hey, can't we just all "get-along" ?? > > Yeah, you seem to be making a huge effort at that your ownself. -- Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries The right to be heard does not automatically include the right to be taken seriously. Hubert H. Humphrey == 2 of 7 == Date: Tues, Jun 15 2010 7:11 am From: "The Greatest" "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhondaleakirk@eart...> wrote in message news:3r4fdi.ieg.17.1@news...... > spooge wrote: > > "The Greatest" <honestjohn@cent...> wrote in > > news:EJidnYWBYqLKFozRnZ2dnUVZ_hidnZ2d@cent...: > > <snipped> > > >> Did he want to know a little information about the same stAUKers > >> that called her a "Bunny-Burner" and a "pedophile" ?? The same > >> stAUKers that made her life a "living hell" because they sided > >> with Rick Mather instead of her ?? Was she not able to answer a > >> few questions about these stAUKers and be done with the whole > >> matter (no paperwork)......would I risk lawyer fees and bad > >> press to "Clam-up" and protect said stAUKers....?? > > Not my job. Not my obligation. Not something I had the least desire to do. > -- > Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries So let me get this straight: You would rather involve your "Hubby" in a law suit and spend thousands of dollars of your own money (which you will never see again) and go through a year of mental anguish rather than answer a few questions.......right !! Please tell me that you are simply....."pulling my leg" !! Still Love Ya, John C. == 3 of 7 == Date: Tues, Jun 15 2010 7:25 am From: "The Greatest" "MaaBoF" <Maa.BoF@Maa....> wrote in message news:hv7172$qcj$1@unde...... > In article <B-qdnW0rEL_jZIvRnZ2dnUVZ_rOdnZ2d@cent...>, > The Greatest <honestjohn@cent...> wrote: > > > >"spooge" <spooge@data...> barfed-out > > the following "stAUKer propaganda" out of his anus.... > >> "The Greatest" <honestjohn@cent...> wrote in > >> news:EJidnYWBYqLKFozRnZ2dnUVZ_hidnZ2d@cent...: > >> > What exactly was the "bullying" before the "paperwork" ?? > >> > > >> > Did he want to know a little information about the same stAUKers that > >> > called her a "Bunny-Burner" and a "pedophile" ?? The same stAUKers > >> > that made her life a "living hell" because they sided with Rick Mather > >> > instead of her ?? Was she not able to answer a few questions about > >> > these stAUKers and be done with the whole matter (no > >> > paperwork)......would I risk lawyer fees and bad press to "Clam-up" > >> > and protect said stAUKers....?? > >> > >> You seem to be forgetting a couple of things. > > STFU stooge. Forgetting you is the way to go. > > > >No, you're trying to defend stAUKers which is an impossible job....you Idiot !! > > > >> > >> 1) One of the defendants is her spouse > > Yes, a coward. > > >* Does he not have a mouth to answer a few questions all by himself ?? > >* Does he have to be taken care of his whole life by a woman ?? > >* Does he not have any "common sense" to not get involved in these proceedings > > by simply dealing with the problem and "moving-along" with his life? > > > > > >> 2) The claim is/was bogus <SPLAT> > > You;re bogus > > > >* Then why is little "Master Cannon" hiding under his day-bed ?? > >* Your hypothesis has been disproved by defendant Cannon going to trial !! > >* You haven't gotten any smarter in the last year....Spoogie-Toogie !! > > > >> > >> > NEVER.......NOT A CHANCE IN HELL !! > >> > >> You have no backbone if you'd cave to the demands of a bully. > > This coming from Mr. Spineless himself of course. > > > >* It takes more courage to stand-up and apologize like meat plow did than spend > > one's life savings if one does not have to by being STUBBORN and ARROGANT !! > > > >> > Meat Plow made the right choice and did the right thing......he seems > >> > to be the only 'AUK' regular with any "horse-sense" !! > >> > >> Nobody has anything to apologize for, doesn't matter what you or any > >> other kook claims, that's the bottom line. > > The bottom line is spooge has dick to say and several in his mouth most of > the time. LOLOL !! > >* Meat plow is "off the hook" by having something that you and the > > other stAUKers don't have and that's...GUTZ !! > >* Slither on back to 'rec.arts.poems' and write an ode to Peter "Eater" Ross > > and write it down on a piece of paper and then STICK IT UP YOUR ASS !! > > > >Drop by 'AUK' next year and say something "Ignert" for the audience !! > > > Notice how the little weasle hid when all his buddies went down? He's got > lots to say *now* and all kinds of bullshit theory and useless advice but > wasn't within the same solar system when the shit hit the fan and didn't > do squat when the dogs were tearing his buddies to shreds besides STFU > and hide 'til the outcome became public. Spooge (melted sperm) does take a long time to get over a good "butt-spank" !! > To be expected from a freak lawyer hiding behind a sock all these > years I guess. Google the freak's nym "spooge"- > that's about all you need to know about the useless twirp. Right there in the records and files !! > Soon as the CDA gets rebooted he'll be out of AUK commission for good when > all his useless libel spewing malignant stAUKer pals get hauled back to > court and sued real good next time by Chas, talk about poor sports. I can hardly wait !! King Rat will k'lame: "It'll never happen" (just like he did on the 1st. suit) and his buddy Cannon is still hiding under his "day-bed" !! > Hate to admit it but theMEAT may be the only one amongst them > stAUKharharhars that has any jam - the lamester excluded cuz he > ain't no stAUKharharhar. I agree with that there !! -- HJ == 4 of 7 == Date: Tues, Jun 15 2010 7:43 am From: clb@mauv... (Charlotte L. Blackmer) In article <8ibb161h8uh71m9k0l688nds601dc93i36@4ax....>, Lady Veteran <armyvet@bigf...> wrote: >On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 09:13:42 -0700, dev.null@exam... wrote: > >>On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 10:27:34 -0500, Lady Veteran <armyvet@bigf...> >>wrote: >> >>>>Grow up! Try to get a clue. Nobody has any RIGHT to be as successful as they >>>>can be. >>> >>>Well that explains your loss of life interest. >>> >>>> Please tell us in what part of the Constitution that nonsense >>>>appears. >>> >>>Well is it the pursuit of happiness or the happiness of pursuit? >>> >>Which is the Declaration of Independence not part of the U.S. >>Constitution. Spend less time attempting to craft clever sig-files and >>more time on your education and maybe you wouldn't be crying about >>where you aren't today. > >Well unlike you? I am not chasing imaginary fools across Usenet or >allowing my nose to be swatted with a newspaper because I stuck it >where it wasn't welcome. Whoa. Is someone frogging (or actually forging) Bobbi here? Because she has been chasing anon fools and a few non-anon people who have done things only in her imagination across Usenet (and threatened for Real Life) for some time now. We won't get into getting her nose swatted. If she'd learned to trim newsgroup lines a dozen years ago and stop trying to make several other places into SSFA when they weren't, things would have been different. Charlotte -- == 5 of 7 == Date: Tues, Jun 15 2010 7:52 am From: Lady Veteran On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 02:31:17 +0000 (UTC), spooge <spooge@data...> wrote: >"The Greatest" <honestjohn@cent...> wrote in >news:EJidnYWBYqLKFozRnZ2dnUVZ_hidnZ2d@cent...: > >> >> "miguel" <miguel@insu...> wrote in message >> news:mh0216l4km0caivetk0819sb4at39494ka@4ax....... >>> On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 09:16:29 -0500, "The Greatest" >>> <honestjohn@cent...> wrote: >>> >>> > >>> >"miguel" <miguel@insu...> wrote in message >> news:har0165qjeosdvvm6ratr9oabphe476bcq@4ax....... >>> >> On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 01:50:13 +0000 (UTC), MaaBoF <Maa.BoF@Maa....> >>> >> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> >In article >> <7cbfb3d8-4913-48d8-85ca-05369a120bdf@s9g2...>, >>> >> >Russell Tavek <restaveksanmaman@yaho...> wrote: >>> >> >>On Jun 8, 11:08 pm, " Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." >> <gregh...@home...> >>> >> >>wrote: >> What exactly was the "bullying" before the "paperwork" ?? >> >> Did he want to know a little information about the same stAUKers that >> called her a "Bunny-Burner" and a "pedophile" ?? The same stAUKers >> that made her life a "living hell" because they sided with Rick Mather >> instead of her ?? Was she not able to answer a few questions about >> these stAUKers and be done with the whole matter (no >> paperwork)......would I risk lawyer fees and bad press to "Clam-up" >> and protect said stAUKers....?? > >You seem to be forgetting a couple of things. > >1) One of the defendants is her spouse >2) The claim is/was bogus as far as the people named as defendants goes > >> NEVER.......NOT A CHANCE IN HELL !! > >You have no backbone if you'd cave to the demands of a bully. In all my time trying to make sense of your rambling, this is the first time you said anything that made sense. Your comprehension of the concept is not complete, though. I have been doing that since I showed up in Usenet, yet you say I am clueless? Go play and let the grownups talk. If you continue to show improvement, there may be hope for you but you cannot wear long pants yet-you are not mature enough. ' LV "I rode a tank and held a general's rank When the blitzkrieg raged and the bodies stank." ---Sympathy for the Devil-The Rolling Stones -------------------------------------------- "Some people are only alive because it is illegal to kill them." ---Anonymous ---------------------------------------------- See the latest idiot featured on my blog! My Blog http://ladyveteranslog.blogspot.com --------------------------------------------- "I am really enjoying the new Martin Luther King Jr stamp - just think about all those white bigots, licking the backside of a black man." ----Dick Gregory ----------------------------------------------- Are you being harassed on Usenet and want to fight back instead of leaving the net? Are you willing to stand up to Internet bullies and stalkers? Join my group http://groups.yahoo.com/group/antiCHU ---------------------------------------------- "I am mad as hell and I will not take it anymore!" ---Network == 6 of 7 == Date: Tues, Jun 15 2010 8:57 am From: "Respondant" Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries wrote: Is this STILL going on? And why did it spill over into the nose? Sheesh. > The Greatest wrote: >> "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhondaleakirk@eart...> wrote in >> message news:3r4fdi.ieg.17.1@news...... >>> spooge wrote: >>>> "The Greatest" <honestjohn@cent...> wrote in >>>> news:EJidnYWBYqLKFozRnZ2dnUVZ_hidnZ2d@cent...: >>> >>> <snipped> >>> >>>>> Did he want to know a little information about the same >>>>> stAUKers that called her a "Bunny-Burner" and a "pedophile" ?? >>>>> The same stAUKers that made her life a "living hell" because >>>>> they sided with Rick Mather instead of her ?? Was she not >>>>> able to answer a few questions about these stAUKers and be >>>>> done with the whole matter (no paperwork)......would I risk >>>>> lawyer fees and bad press to "Clam-up" and protect said >>>>> stAUKers....?? >>> >>> Not my job. Not my obligation. Not something I had the least >>> desire to do. -- >>> Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries >> >> So let me get this straight: You would rather involve your >> "Hubby" in a law suit and spend thousands of dollars of your own >> money (which you will never see again) and go through a year of >> mental anguish rather than answer a few questions.......right !! > > So you advocate doing the wrong thing simply because it is easier? As for me ... I issued an apology for a number of reasons. One, was that my 'part' in the whole thing occured more than a year prior to being contacted by Mr. Novins. I had little recollection of what I wrote, or whether it was libelous or not. Nor did I care to go searching through google to find all the posts in which I mentioned his name or replied to a post that did. The man asked for an apology in exchange for leaving me out of the whole mess. Nothing else. I took him at his word that I'd said some things about him that weren't very nice and obliged. I also took that opportunity to sincerely apologize to any/everyone *else* I may have offended along the way. I have a daughter in college and am currently very UNDER-employed. My wife and I have better things to do with our time and money then to give it to a lawyer to defend me against whatever claim(s) was/were going to be made. IMO I did not only the right, but also the *prudent* thing given the circumstances. If IYO, it was the 'wrong thing to do' and makes me a coward, so be it. You're entitled to your opinion. <snip> Bill == 7 of 7 == Date: Tues, Jun 15 2010 8:58 am From: "The Greatest" "Lady Veteran" <armyvet@bigf...> wrote in message > > On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 02:31:17 +0000 (UTC), spooge > > >You seem to be forgetting a couple of things. > > > Go play and let the grownups talk. > > If you continue to show improvement, there may be hope for you but you > cannot wear long pants yet-you are not mature enough. > -- > LV Spooge could wear "Daisy Dukes" and wouldn't have to fear exposing anything !! - HJ ============================================================================== TOPIC: Can my friend's potential employers find out online that she was arrested for these two crimes, even though she wasn't convicted and that she used to call the cops on her husband for domestic disturbance (maybe even for beating her, I'm not sure)? http://groups.google.com/group/misc.legal/t/b0f9a9944a25cf40?hl=en ============================================================================== == 1 of 1 == Date: Tues, Jun 15 2010 5:33 am From: richard On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 14:24:39 -0700 (PDT), Chris Tsao wrote: > Hi, I have a friend who is trying to get kids to baby sit for. Today, > she was hired to baby sit a kid. The parents never showed up to her > house with the kid. > > Therefore, she is wondering whether or not the parents were able to > find out certain information online about her. Such as, she used to > call the cops on her husband when they were living together (I think > because he assualted her?), so she thinks that maybe anybody can find > out online that her name and house are linked to domestic violence. > She was arrested, but never convicted for calling a gay man who > charged her father with a shovel the other F-word (a biased crime) and > she was arrested, but never convicted for shoplifting. She lives in > the state of New York, if that matters. > > I would venture to say that the only way that anyone can find out > about the domestic disturbance calls would be by having personal > connections in law inforcement, no? > > > Thank you in advance. Possible to find out online? Yes. Likely? That would depend on the department ptuting that information online. Why did they not whow up? More than likely they had contacted a handfull of others. Plans changed at the last second. This is a world wide discussion group. There are no requirements that a person answering a question be a licensed attorney. Any one can claim they are an attorney. There is no client pivielege to privacy as YOU are not a client. If you want proper legal advice, hire a licensed attorney. -- I learned my lesson well. You can't please everyone, so you got to please yourself. - Ricky Nelson from "Garden Party" ============================================================================== TOPIC: Children born to non-US citizens could be barred from American birth certificates http://groups.google.com/group/misc.legal/t/903d072e5afd3e10?hl=en ============================================================================== == 1 of 3 == Date: Tues, Jun 15 2010 9:04 am From: "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS" http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/7827706/Children-born-to-non-US-citizens-could-be-barred-from-American-birth-certificates.html Children born to non-US citizens could be barred from American birth certificates Published: 12:01AM BST 15 Jun 2010 Under the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution any child born in the country has an automatic right to citizenship regardless of their parents' legal status. But Republican State Senator Russell Pearce will introduce a bill later this year to target so-called "anchor babies," which he says are used by illegal immigrants to stay in the country. An estimated four million children became US citizens after being born to illegal immigrant parents on US soil in 2008. Senator Pearce, who sponsored that law, said the fact babies born to illegal immigrant parents become US citizens was "the most irrational and self-defeating provision you could have." He said those who had written the 14th Amendment in 1868 had never anticipated the "deluge" that would come. "It's illegal to enter the United States and yet we are going to create the greatest inducement to breaking our law, and entering illegally, and that's making your baby a citizen." Opponents of the proposed bill say it is contrary to the Constitution and the American spirit. The right of Arizona to attempt to deny US citizenship could ultimately end up in the US Supreme Court. The 14th Amendment was drafted in order to secure the citizenship and Constitutional rights of freed slaves and their children. ------------------------------------------------------------------ Actually the constitution does NOT say anyone born in america is automatically a citizen. People should read the 14th amendment. == 2 of 3 == Date: Tues, Jun 15 2010 9:45 am From: Mick Mahan Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS wrote: > Children born to non-US citizens could be barred from American birth > certificates Where WILL _you_ go, now that your parents are known donkey fuckers that your father filmed yer mother having at it with them in Mexico? == 3 of 3 == Date: Tues, Jun 15 2010 9:54 am From: "Carl Alex Friis Nielsen" "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS" <betaxxx@eart...> skrev i en meddelelse news:51b0d3a4-632b-4162-903a-d2b376e9c46c@d37g...... > Actually the constitution does NOT say anyone born in america is > automatically a citizen. People should read the 14th amendment. It does say "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." Are you claiming that illegal aliens and/or their children in US territory are somehow not subject to the jurisdiction of the USA ? ============================================================================== TOPIC: Children born to non-US citizens could be barred from American birth certificates - No mas ANCHOR BABIES http://groups.google.com/group/misc.legal/t/c8dbc790223a7b72?hl=en ============================================================================== == 1 of 2 == Date: Tues, Jun 15 2010 10:05 am From: Bret Cahill > > http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/7827706/Ch... > > > Children born to non-US citizens could be barred from American birth > > certificates > > Published: 12:01AM BST 15 Jun 2010 > > > Under the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution any child born in the > > country has an automatic right to citizenship regardless of their > > parents' legal status. > > > But Republican State Senator Russell Pearce will introduce a bill > > later this year to target so-called "anchor babies," which he says are > > used by illegal immigrants to stay in the country. > > > An estimated four million children became US citizens after being > > born to illegal immigrant parents on US soil in 2008. > > > Senator Pearce, who sponsored that law, said the fact babies born to > > illegal immigrant parents become US citizens was "the most irrational > > and self-defeating provision you could have." > > > He said those who had written the 14th Amendment in 1868 had never > > anticipated the "deluge" that would come. > > > "It's illegal to enter the United States and yet we are going to > > create the greatest inducement to breaking our law, and entering > > illegally, and that's making your baby a citizen." > > > Opponents of the proposed bill say it is contrary to the Constitution > > and the American spirit. > > > The right of Arizona to attempt to deny US citizenship could > > ultimately end up in the US Supreme Court. > > > The 14th Amendment was drafted in order to secure the citizenship and > > Constitutional rights of freed slaves and their children. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > Actually the constitution does NOT say anyone born > > in america is automatically a citizen. > > All courts say it. The legislation is just posturing to humor the border bigots. Repugliar State Senator Russell Pearce knows full well it'll be struck down at every level. > Every single anchor baby ever born has been given citizenship. > > Our laws are based on precedents. There are 100 years of court > decisions and millions of anchor babies as precedent. The Scalito Court may be entering an Age of Discovery where the 5 GOP cabal justices "discover" Social Security and Art. I, Sec. 8 are unconstitutional but they'll never deny anchor babies the right to citizenship. Bret Cahill == 2 of 2 == Date: Tues, Jun 15 2010 10:11 am From: tg On Jun 15, 1:05 pm, Bret Cahill <Bret_E_Cah...@yaho...> wrote: > > >http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/7827706/Ch... > > > > Children born to non-US citizens could be barred from American birth > > > certificates > > > Published: 12:01AM BST 15 Jun 2010 > > > > Under the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution any child born in the > > > country has an automatic right to citizenship regardless of their > > > parents' legal status. > > > > But Republican State Senator Russell Pearce will introduce a bill > > > later this year to target so-called "anchor babies," which he says are > > > used by illegal immigrants to stay in the country. > > > > An estimated four million children became US citizens after being > > > born to illegal immigrant parents on US soil in 2008. > > > > Senator Pearce, who sponsored that law, said the fact babies born to > > > illegal immigrant parents become US citizens was "the most irrational > > > and self-defeating provision you could have." > > > > He said those who had written the 14th Amendment in 1868 had never > > > anticipated the "deluge" that would come. > > > > "It's illegal to enter the United States and yet we are going to > > > create the greatest inducement to breaking our law, and entering > > > illegally, and that's making your baby a citizen." > > > > Opponents of the proposed bill say it is contrary to the Constitution > > > and the American spirit. > > > > The right of Arizona to attempt to deny US citizenship could > > > ultimately end up in the US Supreme Court. > > > > The 14th Amendment was drafted in order to secure the citizenship and > > > Constitutional rights of freed slaves and their children. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------- > > > > Actually the constitution does NOT say anyone born > > > in america is automatically a citizen. > > > All courts say it. > > The legislation is just posturing to humor the border bigots. > > Repugliar State Senator Russell Pearce knows full well it'll be struck > down at every level. > > > Every single anchor baby ever born has been given citizenship. > > > Our laws are based on precedents. There are 100 years of court > > decisions and millions of anchor babies as precedent. > > The Scalito Court may be entering an Age of Discovery where the 5 GOP > cabal justices "discover" Social Security and Art. I, Sec. 8 are > unconstitutional but they'll never deny anchor babies the right to > citizenship. > > Bret Cahill I still can't figure out why I should care if the population is increasing from babies born to Citizens, Illegal Aliens, Legal Aliens, Alien Aliens, blah blah blah. It still means more taxes and fewer jobs. -tg ============================================================================== TOPIC: Does this govt ruling violate the First Amendment right to free speech? http://groups.google.com/group/misc.legal/t/952eb0d0c6979da1?hl=en ============================================================================== == 1 of 1 == Date: Tues, Jun 15 2010 10:11 am From: "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS wrote: > The movie industry objects when people tape music off the radio so the > FCC has banned radio stations from publishing advance program > listings!!! Does it violate our First Amendment rights? Probably, but at present there are far more glaring Bill of Rights violations that most Americans seem to totally ignore! ============================================================================== TOPIC: get kelp http://groups.google.com/group/misc.legal/t/2e81cbc61ca760bc?hl=en ============================================================================== == 1 of 1 == Date: Tues, Jun 15 2010 10:20 am From: kb9rqz On May 24, 12:03 pm, kb9rqz <m...@kb9r...> wrote: > On May 23, 12:33 pm, kb9rqz <m...@kb9r...> wrote: > > > > > On May 23, 2:08 am, Rev 11D Meow! <Ji...@Crac...> wrote: > > > > DEAF EARS HEAR ZIP!- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - ============================================================================== You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "misc.legal" group. To post to this group, visit http://groups.google.com/group/misc.legal?hl=en To unsubscribe from this group, send email to misc.legal+unsubscribe@goog... To change the way you get mail from this group, visit: http://groups.google.com/group/misc.legal/subscribe?hl=en To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to abuse@goog... ============================================================================== Google Groups: http://groups.google.com/?hl=en Bookmark with:  Delicious
 Digg
 reddit
 Facebook
 StumbleUpon
opensubscriber is not affiliated with the authors of this message nor responsible for its content. |
All rights reserved.