Marsha,
I never have a problem with your statements, I just ask questions.  I have a problem with your refusing to answe questions since this is a discussion forum, not one to propagandize.

So, my question to you statement is:

Would your truth about static patterns being the way to view truth conform with fact or reality?  If so, how?

Sent laboriously from an iPhone,
Mark

On Jan 13, 2012, at 10:38 PM, MarshaV <valkyr@att....> wrote:

>
> Greetings,
>
> I take the term 'truth' to mean "conformity with fact or reality".  In most definitions, “reality” is pretty much defined as “that which exists”.  In the MoQ, static patterns on value exist; exist not as independent, inherent entities, but as patterns.  As such, I take static patterns of value to represent truths.
>
> Anybody have a problem with the above statement?
>
>
> Marsha
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html