Sent from my iPad

On Jan 19, 2012, at 6:22 AM, David Harding <davidjharding@gmai...> wrote:

> Hi Marsha,
>
> Static patterns of value are processes, conditionally co-dependent,
> impermanent, ever-changing and conceptualized, that pragmatically tend to
> persist and change within a stable, predictable pattern.  Within the MoQ,
> these patterns are morally categorized into a four-level, evolutionary,
> hierarchical structure:  inorganic, biological, social and intellectual.
> This static value exists in stable patterns relative to other patterns:
> patterns depend upon innumerable causes and conditions (patterns), depend
> upon parts and the collection of parts (patterns), depend upon conceptual
> designation (patterns). Patterns have no independent, inherent existence.
> Further, these patterns represent "what works" depending upon on an
> individual's static pattern of life history.
>
>
> I (I?) never stated that I like the fact that patterns need (need?) to be
> relative and dependent upon each other.
>
>
> But you think it's a good explanation that they are dependent and relative
> right? Why is that?

Hello David,

I think my definition states that static patterns of value are dependent and relative.  


Marsha.





> Curiously,
>
>
> -David.
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html