I am fine with keeping emotions indefinable. How do we talk about
them then? If something being indefinable makes it comprehensible to
you, then by all means use that.
I see no reason to intellectualize the emotional as modern psychology
seeks to do, so I agree with you. Just think, they are trying to
provide a logical structure to the illogical. Is this even allowed?
How is it that the intellect can bind the non-intellectual in this
way? What if emotions tried to bring the intellect into the
How is it that reason can claim that spirituality is not real? Can
spirituality claim that reason is not real as well? I suppose so. I
suppopse it depends on who has the biggest army in terms of which one
dominates. The imperial forces of science have got the edge right
now. But, there is turmoil in parts of the world that may reverse
this at any time. Especially if the tools of science are used against
the reason of science. Praise be, indeed.