Hi Mark,

Kid gloves?  I come from a family with 14 children and differences became
acceptable after enough squabbling.

Joe


On 2/12/12 5:46 PM, "118" <ununoctiums@gmai...> wrote:

> OK Joe,
> Thanks for your opinion.
>
> Sent laboriously from an iPhone,
> Mark
>
> On Feb 12, 2012, at 4:58 PM, Joseph  Maurer <jhmau@comc...> wrote:
>
>> Hi Mark;
>>
>> I don't know that "better half" is a level in evolution.  It is certainly
>> sweet of you to suggest that your wife is your better half, but I don't see
>> marriage as DQ/SQ evolution since men exist and women exist without marrying
>> and human babies are not a new species!
>>
>> I am afraid my poetic license is not useful in MOQ!  I certainly misspoke if
>> poetic license "Marriage as analogous to DQ/SQ" is accepted as evolution
>> instead of social control in differences.
>>
>> Joe
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2/11/12 10:41 PM, "118" <ununoctiums@gmai...> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Joe,
>>> I must confess, I have no idea what you are talking about, but it
>>> sounds interesting.  Type away, I am listening.  I know that my wife
>>> is my better half.
>>> Mark
>>>
>>> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Joseph  Maurer <jhmau@comc...> wrote:
>>>> Hi Mark and all,
>>>>
>>>> I do not know how you view sexual differences: Man/Woman.  An emphasis on
>>>> differences between men and women is physically discernable.  I put more
>>>> trust in the emotional response of women than that of men.  Gender is
>>>> meaningful as well as physical.  I talk about emotions with some reserve.
>>>> I
>>>> think being tongue-tied for a man in the presence of a woman has a real
>>>> basis.  Since Louise has passed I kind of flounder around at the keyboard
>>>> since I can't ask her.
>>>>
>>>> I fully approve of an emphasis on common aid in marriage as analogous to
>>>> DQ/SQ.  It makes life very much more meaningful.  I note that SQ side of
>>>> man
>>>> follows a DQ(emotional) side of Woman creating the opportunity for
>>>> perceiving emphasis.
>>>>
>>>> Joe
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2/10/12 4:05 PM, "118" <ununoctiums@gmai...> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I am fine with keeping emotions indefinable.  How do we talk about
>>>>> them then?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>>> Archives:
>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>> Archives:
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>>
>>
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html


Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html