Metaphysics is a format. Physics follows the defined description of a
format. Meaning in DQ/SQ follows the format where one aspect of knowledge
is indefinable by individualization. In evolution 1 is not definable and
mathematical logic is inadequate.
In analogy and metaphor true terms exist and are knowable even though
indefinable. Agreement is necessary in discussing DQ/SQ since there is no
possibility for certainty when discussing an indefinable in a closed logic.
A better idea is usually around the corner like DQ/SQ. Doing one's best is
the condition of metaphysical logic as opposed to a computer's relational
mathematical logic in physics.
My interpretation of the metaphysics of quality DQ/SQ follows a paradigm.
Meaning lies in the format not an individual interpretation which must
remain DQ since there are no indefinable words. Meaning is not an agreement
between individuals but the acceptance of DQ/SQ metaphysics MOQ which in my
opinion must include evolution.
IMHO Meaning follows evolution. You disavow indefinable meaning in
communication, and put the burden of interpretation on the reader to
understand your use of words instead of appealing to the individualized
metaphysics of evolution that you are using. A hint to how you view the
knowledge of an indefinable reality would be useful.