You mention a "God hypothesis" and other intriguing claims, but I did not
see a reference to the evolution of levels in existence to describe
individuality in reality.
The individual cannot have defining existence but can be defined by the
existence it has. Evolution is an interesting word. E(x) Voluntas, in
Latin: From Will. Whose will? There has to be an order for Will to have
any meaning. Order in evolution can be described in terms of levels in
Is existence so all inclusive that only non-existence can measure up leaving
the search for the reality in evolution outside of existence?
> But I
> think a "given" universe with me an integral part of it is much less
> confusing. I can't imagine how to teach children in grade school the MoQ
> when people here, many with college degrees, can't come to any common
> agreement on what he says, let alone what he means. So I agree that Lila
> confuses more than clarifies. And ZatAoMM, while intriguing, makes
> claims,IMHO, that in the end will not and cannot be verified. Very similar,
> IMHO, to the God hypothesis.