What you write about walking steps is Zen, and indeed noble, in my opinion. I was using the step metaphor to imply that one can go simply by words, or by what they represent.
All I know of you are from your posts, which are sometimes of low Quality, but then often are mine. I appreciate it when that is pointed out to me, for I use this forum to improve my presentation of what I personally see Quality to be. I of course learn what I am seeing along the way,
Sent laboriously from an iPhone,
On Feb 28, 2012, at 5:59 PM, Tuukka Virtaperko <mail@tuuk...> wrote:
> Marsha, Mark,
> I just walk the stairs... I don't remember why I'm doing this, and I don't mind. I mean, of course I could give you a lot of post hoc reasons about why it's useful to walk stairs... such as saving people from insanity, developing AI, unifying a significant portion of philosophy which has not yet been unified. But... uhh... I ... why do -I- do this? The moment I'm doing it? I just find the formulae beautiful, I'm interested of them, I'm interested of the logic. And I get the feeling that I'm seen as some sort of a pervert for this tendency of mine. It's funny. I just asked for a neuropsychological detail, and now I'm doing something wrong?
> I am where you are. At least I've been there. And I can go back there. But I don't talk about the MOQ so much. I live the MOQ. Is that what you are doubting? That I would live some "sentential logic" or "neuropsychology" instead of the MOQ?
> From my point of view, there's not that much to casually discuss about the MOQ before I get my theory done. I follow these mailing lists for new ideas, but I don't see the point of this conversation. You are surely doubting something, and I'd like to know what it is. I still have the feeling you probably have a false assumption about me, but I've been wrong on these kind of things occasionally. I write the formulae like I breath. I'm driven to it like an animal. Should I be some actor, behaving all fancy-pansy because his formulae are so fancy-pansy? They're not fancy-pansy for me when I work with them. I'm just figuring out what they mean and learning maths at the same time.
> So, what is the cause of your suspicion?
> 29.2.2012 0:41, 118 kirjoitti:
>> Do you walk up stairs just for the purpose of walking up stairs? If
>> you did, you would be caught up in the world of stairs. That is all
>> that I am saying.
>> On 2/28/12, Tuukka Virtaperko<mail@tuuk...> wrote:
>>> Let us not get caught up in the words or what is left out.
>>> That's like saying "let's not get caught up in the stairs" to someone
>>> who's walking them.
>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >>> Archives:
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html >>>
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >> http://moq.org/md/archives.html >>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.