Hi Tuukka,
What you write about walking steps is Zen, and indeed noble, in my opinion.  I was using the step metaphor to imply that one can go simply by words, or by what they represent.

All I know of you are from your posts, which are sometimes of low Quality,  but then often are mine.  I appreciate it when that is pointed out to me, for I use this forum to improve my presentation of what I personally see Quality to be. I of course learn what I am seeing along the way,

Peace

Sent laboriously from an iPhone,
Mark

On Feb 28, 2012, at 5:59 PM, Tuukka Virtaperko <mail@tuuk...> wrote:

> Marsha, Mark,
> I just walk the stairs... I don't remember why I'm doing this, and I don't mind. I mean, of course I could give you a lot of post hoc reasons about why it's useful to walk stairs... such as saving people from insanity, developing AI, unifying a significant portion of philosophy which has not yet been unified. But... uhh... I ... why do -I- do this? The moment I'm doing it? I just find the formulae beautiful, I'm interested of them, I'm interested of the logic. And I get the feeling that I'm seen as some sort of a pervert for this tendency of mine. It's funny. I just asked for a neuropsychological detail, and now I'm doing something wrong?
>
> I am where you are. At least I've been there. And I can go back there. But I don't talk about the MOQ so much. I live the MOQ. Is that what you are doubting? That I would live some "sentential logic" or "neuropsychology" instead of the MOQ?
>
> From my point of view, there's not that much to casually discuss about the MOQ before I get my theory done. I follow these mailing lists for new ideas, but I don't see the point of this conversation. You are surely doubting something, and I'd like to know what it is. I still have the feeling you probably have a false assumption about me, but I've been wrong on these kind of things occasionally. I write the formulae like I breath. I'm driven to it like an animal. Should I be some actor, behaving all fancy-pansy because his formulae are so fancy-pansy? They're not fancy-pansy for me when I work with them. I'm just figuring out what they mean and learning maths at the same time.
>
> So, what is the cause of your suspicion?
>
> -T.
>
>
>
> 29.2.2012 0:41, 118 kirjoitti:
>> Tuukka,
>> Do you walk up stairs just for the purpose of walking up stairs?  If
>> you did, you would be caught up in the world of stairs.  That is all
>> that I am saying.
>> Cheers,
>> Mark
>>
>> On 2/28/12, Tuukka Virtaperko<mail@tuuk...>  wrote:
>>> Mark,
>>>
>>> Mark:
>>> Let us not get caught up in the words or what is left out.
>>>
>>> Tuukka:
>>> That's like saying "let's not get caught up in the stairs" to someone
>>> who's walking them.
>>>
>>> -Tuukka
>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>> Archives:
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>>>
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html