Marsha,
If patterns have no independent existence, how is it that you
recognize them as distinct patterns?  What you are really saying is
that there is only one pattern, that spreads about, co-operating with
itself.  What makes you want to divide them up into many?  Are you the
pattern separator?  Why would you even want to do that?

According to your metaphysics, Static Quality cannot exist in stable
patterns since such patterns do not exist; we only have a monistic
pattern.  Where would you say your plurality of patterns comes from if
they have no inherent existence?  With your inclusion of all into one
pattern, are you speaking of God?
Mark

On 2/29/12, MarshaV <valkyr@att....> wrote:
>
>
>
> Tuukka,
>
> "Nonrelativizably"?  It is you who are exhibiting stuckness in some
> post-modern philosophical,  muddled thinking (words and concepts), or is it
> Plato's distortion.  Either way it is stuckness.  You are stuck in your
> representation of relativity.  Let go of that.  That understanding is
> static.  Move on.
>
> Quality may be compared to quantum physics's nonlocality.  Statics quality
> exists in stable patterns relative to other patterns.  Patterns have no
> independent existence.
>
>
> Marsha
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html