Hi Joseph,
> DQ is a metaphysical term, indefinable in levels in existence, evolution.
> DQ is not non-existent. Behavior follows existence DQ/SQ. Emotions are DQ.
>  
>  

This is contrary to what Pirsig has claimed:  

"As I understand it the term “emotivism” is a way of reducing all value to biology, thus making it a part of the SOM universe. The MOQ sees emotions as a biological response to quality and not the same thing as quality. There are many cases, particularly in economic activity where values occur without any emotion." - LC

Why do you see value in reducing the MOQ to an emotional response?

Furthermore, why do you see value in defining the undefinable DQ as 'emotions'?

-David.

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html