opensubscriber
   Find in this group all groups
 
Unknown more information…

m : moq_discuss@lists.moqtalk.org 14 April 2012 • 7:15AM -0400

Re: [MD] The Future of the MOQ
by Joseph Maurer

REPLY TO AUTHOR
 
REPLY TO GROUP




Hi Tuukka and All,

Mathematics is a formal language, definable terms only for logic.  MOQ
metaphysics supports logic in discussing indefinable/definable reality
DQ/SQ.  

Rigid logic in mathematics does not configure evolution it accepts
evolution described by metaphysics.  1 is created, not evolved from 0.
Division by 0 produces an error message.  Mathematics does not logically
validate conceptualized, indefinable/definable levels in existence,
evolution.  DQ/SQ metaphysics stand alone.   MOQ accepts evolution and looks
beyond mathematical logic to metaphysics and value in a defined SQ,
indefinable DQ description of reality.

Mathematics, uses the metaphysical concept of defined 0ne, rigorous logic.
There is no mathematics of creation before SQ 1.  Metaphysical logic MOQ
accepts the indefinable DQ.  Math logic accepts reality from the
metaphysical concept which describes an existing indefinable base DQ
becoming 1 SQ, in evolution.

Joe


On 4/12/12 4:59 PM, "Tuukka Virtaperko" <mail@tuuk...> wrote:

> Maybe you don't want the academia to get its dirty hands on the MOQ, so
> they wouldn't ruin it. Like they ruined the Pythagorean theorem. Except
> that theorem has not changed one bit for millenia. It hasn't changed,
> because it's mathematics. It's based on a formal language, which makes
> it possible to communicate unambiguously.


Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Bookmark with:

Delicious   Digg   reddit   Facebook   StumbleUpon

Related Messages

opensubscriber is not affiliated with the authors of this message nor responsible for its content.