opensubscriber
   Find in this group all groups
 
Unknown more information…

m : moq_discuss@lists.moqtalk.org 26 April 2012 • 4:32AM -0400

Re: [MD] A problem with the MOQ.
by Tuukka Virtaperko

REPLY TO AUTHOR
 
REPLY TO GROUP




Andre,
>
> The only thing I find, on this discuss with regards to 'improvements
> on Pirsig's MOQ' are organic and primal social (i.e biological and
> narcissistic) wanks.

Why don't you stop wanking *me* and complaining you wouldn't like to do
so? :D

In my previous message, I told the SOQ can be used to make Langan and
others understand a mistake in the CTMU, which is a surprisingly popular
metaphysical theory Langan uses to advocate fascism and eugenics. How is
that not a result?

The canonic MOQ doesn't appeal to analytic philosophers. But no more
underlining of this point. As you do not seem to know, what analytic
philosophy is, this point is irrelevant for you. I don't plan to help
you with that. Sorry.

Tuukka
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Bookmark with:

Delicious   Digg   reddit   Facebook   StumbleUpon

Related Messages

opensubscriber is not affiliated with the authors of this message nor responsible for its content.