On May 17, 2012, at 1:04 PM, Andre Broersen wrote:
> I am perfectly happy with understanding the MoQ as Reaiity = Value(Dynamic/static),
> But the MoQ is NOT Reality Marsha, for goodness sake. It is a static intellectual description of… .
And I did NOT state that the MoQ is Reality. Do you need reading glasses?
> but then naturally want to go to investigate static patterns of value.
> Yeah, you are here to investigate all you like but unfortunately never learn anything. What's the use of investigating something without being receptive to what you find along the way? You are determined NOT to accept Pirsig's MOQ as Pirsig explains and unforlds it.
SweetPea, I had years of changing diapers, and years of cleaning up fur-balls. You are easy to ignore.