Hello Joe,

I think your understanding is wonderful!  I've never denied the importance of static quality. I am not comatose. I am a static girl, living in a static world like everyone else.  I have created my own two-level approach to static (patterned) value and a neat little definition; it's not like I've ignored static quality, or evolution.  And I've even used words.  !!!   But under it all, the fundamental nature of sq is DQ.

I am happy for your have a humble opinion.


Marsha



On Jun 25, 2012, at 3:33 PM, Joseph  Maurer <jhmau@comc...> wrote:

> Hi Marsha and All,
>
> How do we know "all that exists"?
> Pirsig describes the experience of reality as DQ/SQ, indefinable/definable
> reality.  
>
> I conceptualize a manifestation of the differences in species, as evolution,
> a manifestation of levels in existence.
>
> Indefinable DQ is individual perception. Definable SQ is evolved conception,
> the individual in its origin.
>
> How we know follows metaphysics.  SOM suggests we know by abstraction.
>
> IMHO MOQ accepts the direct experience of evolving/evolved reality DQ/SQ.
> Metaphysics describes levels of existence in indefinable DQ/definable SQ
> individuality.  
>
>
> On 6/25/12 12:30 AM, "MarshaV" <valkyr@att....> wrote:
>
>> The MoQ is afterall a monism (with Quality the source of all that exists.)
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html