I think your understanding is wonderful! I've never denied the importance of static quality. I am not comatose. I am a static girl, living in a static world like everyone else. I have created my own two-level approach to static (patterned) value and a neat little definition; it's not like I've ignored static quality, or evolution. And I've even used words. !!! But under it all, the fundamental nature of sq is DQ.
I am happy for your have a humble opinion.
On Jun 25, 2012, at 3:33 PM, Joseph Maurer <jhmau@comc...> wrote: