Hi Mark,
?
On 7/6/12 10:24 AM, "118" <
ununoctiums@gmai...> wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> My point was that viewing existence through the primary concept of Value
> may not be of value for everyone. Christianity, Buddism, Islam,
> Existentialism, Science, are also not for everybody. MoQ provides a
> different paradigm with which to view reality. Many are content with the
> manner in which they view such reality. That is all that I meant.
>
> One cannot derive an awareness of the world as Value by simply reading
> about it. This reading is an SOM approach to understanding and will not
> get one to a non-SOM way of getting it. If one uses science as the true
> means for deriving a relationship with existence, one misses much else that
> can possibly provide meaning, Quality being one such possibility. Pirsig
> goes to great lengths to describe Quality through his introduction of MoQ.
> However, what he provides is not in the words he writes, but in what his
> intentions are with the words.
>
> I am glad that you see Quality as a term for everything, and that it has
> changed your life. Not everybody will see it this way. Physics is also a
> metaphysics since it attempts to describe What Is. Unfortunately it only
> relies on the measurable. This measurable is an SQ that we have created.
> It is part of the Church of reason. MoQ goes beyond reason and gives one
> an opportunity to begin to see things differently. There are some
> instructions, but it is what each person does with those instructions that
> is important. We learn how to drive through instructions. However,
> driving is much more than those instructions. They just help one get
> started.
>
> Cheers,
> Mark
>
> On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Joseph Maurer <
jhmau@comc...> wrote:
>
>> Hi Mark and all,
>>
>> You state Quality is not for everyone who qualifies? Metaphysics formats
>> physics, and I would say that gravity is for everyone on a planet, physics.
>> Metaphysics accepts Dq/SQ replacing SOM.
>>
>> IMHO Quality as a metaphysical term is everything.
>>
>> Joe
>>
>>
>> On 7/4/12 5:52 PM, "118" <
ununoctiums@gmai...> wrote:
>>
>>> Quality is not for everybody. Especially those who expect to find it
>> through
>>> words.
>>
>>
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>>
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
>
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
opensubscriber is not affiliated with the authors of this message nor responsible for its content.