> dmb,
>
> Not the quote or the article even used the word 'undifferentiated' except
> the Zen quote that you presented associating it with nirvana. I take
> 'undifferentiate' to mean lacking difference or distinction. My
> statement still stands that if Dynamic Quality is undifferentiated, it
> cannot be about perceptions (smells, sounds, tastes, visions, and
> feelings) which are differentiated; which require a spacial-temporal
> framework; and which are dependent on human sense apparatus? Dynamic
> Quality is indivisible, undefinable and unknowable; it is
> undifferentiated; it is not perceptions - not smells, not sounds, not
> taste, not visions, and not feelings.
>
> Marsha
