Mark to Horse:
Believe me, I fully understand what all those mentioned below is
saying, and I do not have any problem with the philosophy aspects of
it.
Andre:
I am convinced that you do not ' fully understand'  Mark. In fact, you
seem to understand ver little indeed.

Mark:
In truth, I am saying the same things just in a different way.  I
have yet to be informed of a problem that I need to address,...

Andre:
No Mark, you do not. As an example I can refer you to your wacko
response to my criticism of your statement that ' ideas come before
DQ' , that ' thinking is DQ'  and you, along with Marsha keep having
problems with the distinction DQ and sq. Many on this discuss, insofar
as they have either given up or are simply not responding to your
drivel have indeed criticized you BUT you do not see it as such. Your
retort has been and continues to be the line I have pasted above. You
say: ' I just say things differently' . Well Mark, you do not. And
when Anthony does his best to be as diplomatic as possible about your
faulty perceptions regarding the MoQ, trying to tease out reasonably
tolerable passages of your writing, and you respond to him in the way
you have recently done I, along with a few other am getting pretty
cheesed off with you. Who the fuck do you think you are Mark
responding to Anthony in such a way?

I refer you to my earlier suggestion to get a copy of Anthony's
PhD...Anthony has made you a very good offer and what does he get? Can
you remember what you said? You said something like: ' Well Anthony
hasn't given (!) me a copy yet so maby he doesn't want me to have
one...SO DON'T BLAME ME' for not having a copy !!!!!!!!!!!!! Now what
type of reasoning is that???

I have worked in psychiatry for a few years Mark. That is why I
suggested to you to talk to someone...professionally. And the reason I
say this is because of the following:

Mark to Horse:
It would appear that the quality that you create out of my posts is
lacking.  This is not my fault, for what you are presented with is
words on a screen.  They are neutral.  It is you and others that bring
those words value.  All I do is write them.  So, you cannot rightly
blame me, can you?

Andre:
Do you, Mark...at all...see the resemblance in your reasoning like to
above? Everyone else is to blame. You are the one misunderstood. You
are the one writing Quality. It's just that no-one else sees it. You
are not to blame!! This, my friend is classical PD stuff. Yes, look it
up if you want. You really need help. And you certainly won't find it
here because you are the only one who ' completely understands the
MoQ'  as you stated a few posts back. Boy it must be frustrating for
you.

Boy it must be lonely at the top. And, boy we should all be so
grateful to have your company here. You, your eminent quality lordship
lowering himself from his heights to be surrounded by dumb-wits who
simply do not understand his eminence himself. ' Cannot create quality
out of my posts' ? Of course...do not blame Mark.

Get a life Mark. Get out of here.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html