opensubscriber
   Find in this group all groups
 
Unknown more information…

m : moq_focus@moqtalk.org 17 February 2006 • 12:30PM -0500

Re: [MF] reality: interactions or quality?
by Muzikhed

REPLY TO AUTHOR
 
REPLY TO GROUP





Kevin said -

Ted, you  mentioned "[getting] to the point quicker."  Other than the
enjoyment  of a thoughtful and engaging conversation I'm not sure there is
a point to  my questions


Ted replies -
Right.  Sorry, I realized afterwards that it's not about  speed.  I'd do
better to slow myself down.    I wrote a 1500  word reply the other day, but did
not send it, as I felt it repeated some  mistakes I made in an earlier attempt
to communicate.  Too much, too  fast.  

I am reminded of that concept of cognitive resonance.  It is just a  way of
thinking about your feelings about your thoughts.... I guess.  It  says:




1) If you generally respect a person, and agree with them on a significant  
issue, there is a cognitive resonance - a harmony.
2) If you generally respect a person, but disagree with them on a  
significant issue, there is a dissonance - a dis-harmony.


3) If you generally do not respect a person, but agree with them on a  
significant issue, there is a cognitive dissonance - a dis-harmony.
4) If you generally do not respect a person, and also disagree with them on  
a significant issue, there is again a cognitive resonance - a harmony.

When communicating with you, I have felt an increasing sense of 2)  
dissonance.
I've come to respect your integrity amidst much disagreement.
It is simply a frustrating feeling, but this is to be expected.  No  fault,
no blame.

As the MoQ points out, we need to keep the social level stable, so that we  
can continue the intellectual discussion.  With too much dynamic  interaction,
we could lose the static structure we need to make progress toward  a better
(more harmonic) state.  
We need the freedom to let our ideas out, or it would be dull, and  
worthless.  But we also do not want too much freedom.  We need social  constraints like
respect and patience, too much  freedom would cause a break down, a loss of
the platform we now  have.
So, we go forward into the unknown.   There is tomorrow, and we  have no idea
what could come.  

Maybe I'll get back to those 1500 words someday, and make them  better.

Ted
  





_______________________________________________
moq_focus mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_focus-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_focus-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_focus_archive/

Bookmark with:

Delicious   Digg   reddit   Facebook   StumbleUpon

Related Messages

opensubscriber is not affiliated with the authors of this message nor responsible for its content.