opensubscriber
   Find in this group all groups
 
Unknown more information…

m : moq_focus@moqtalk.org 19 February 2006 • 9:10PM -0500

Re: [MF] Onward and downward!
by MarshaV

REPLY TO AUTHOR
 
REPLY TO GROUP




At 06:36 AM 2/19/2006, Steve wrote:

>hahaha...Now THERE's an interesting twist!
>
>Of course you REALISE Marsha, that now 'we' have to dissect what
>'qualities' and levels of love (Love?) exist and that is sure to
>provoke a similar result of Metaphysical perceptions...

I don't think it should.  The concept of love is a description of a
high quality experience.  Once it is experienced, it is subject to
the static quality that affects all re-interpretation.  If a person
holds the belief (static quality) that the high quality experience
called love can only be gotten through an interpersonal or religious
experience, they are filtering out a huge amount of dynamic experience.

I think it's enough to know love represent a high quality experience
with the MOQ.  I see no reason to interpret or intellectualize
individual experiences.  I do see value in detaching it from as much
static quality as possible and going for the dynamic.


While sustaining biological and social patterns
Kill all intellectual patterns.
Kill them completely
And then follow Dynamic Quality
And morality will be served.
                      (LILA, Chapter 32)

Marsha






_______________________________________________
moq_focus mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_focus-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_focus-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_focus_archive/

Bookmark with:

Delicious   Digg   reddit   Facebook   StumbleUpon

Related Messages

opensubscriber is not affiliated with the authors of this message nor responsible for its content.