> According to the Metaphysics of Quality, as I understand it, the
> Metaphysics of Quality exists for people who judge it to be valuable. It
> does not exist for people who find no value in it. What I'd be interested
> in talking about is why some people find value in it and why some people
> don't.
Doesn't Pirsig argue that it is the 'highest quality explanation available'? I'm
not sure he'd run with the idea that its existence is dependent on whether it is
seen as being of value or not.
But the second part of your point is of interest to me too.
