opensubscriber
   Find in this group all groups
 
Unknown more information…

m : moq_focus@moqtalk.org 26 February 2006 • 11:35PM -0500

Re: [MF] reality: interactions or quality?
by Sam Norton

REPLY TO AUTHOR
 
REPLY TO GROUP




er.... Hi Marsha... I replied to this four days ago - did you not receive it?

Sam
http://elizaphanian.blogspot.com/
----- Original Message -----
From: "MarshaV" <marshalz@char...>
To: <moq_focus@moqt...>
Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2006 2:56 PM
Subject: Re: [MF] reality: interactions or quality?


>
>
> At 11:14 AM 2/20/2006, Sam wrote:
>  >>>6. If we want to understand the philosophy of love, the
>  >>>religious traditions are a very good place to start.
>
>
> At 12:10 PM 2/20/2006 Marsha wrote:
>  >>Hi Sam,
>  >>         The history of religion might indicate otherwise.
>
> Sam,
>
> Why does anybody need you or any priest, minister, pastor, etc. ,etc.,
> etc..., or your <religious tradition (static quality)>, or any <religious
> tradition (static quality)>, to run interference in one's own experience?
> Are people basically incompetent to figure "things" out for themselves?
>
> Marsha
>
> _______________________________________________
> moq_focus mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_focus-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_focus-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_focus_archive/
>
>
>


_______________________________________________
moq_focus mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_focus-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_focus-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_focus_archive/

Bookmark with:

Delicious   Digg   reddit   Facebook   StumbleUpon

Related Messages

opensubscriber is not affiliated with the authors of this message nor responsible for its content.