opensubscriber
   Find in this group all groups
 
Unknown more information…

o : ogf-l@mail.opengamingfoundation.org 18 August 2006 • 2:26AM -0400

Re: [Ogf-l] Re: OGL Logo
by Tom Caudron

REPLY TO AUTHOR
 
REPLY TO GROUP




Yeah, I agree that is the danger of any license.  But discounting the
sort of out-of-the-blue legal upset that could derail us all (and is
unlikely in the extreme), I guess all I'm trying to say is that
Prometheus is not particularly at risk above other d20srd-based works,
which was the original implication I was addressing.

Tom Caudron
Administrator of the Prometheus Project
http://www.PrometheusGaming.com



On Thu, 2006-08-17 at 08:10 -0700, Steven Trustrum wrote:
> >
> > I tend to believe that amongst all the various lawyers all of us have
> > spoken with, at least one of them would have raised the red flag if the
> > terms of the OGL were somehow dangerously mercurial or if there were
> > enforcement leeway on those terms that made them so.
>
> No matter how many lawyers one personally consults on the OGL (I've
> contacted two myself for different reasons), or how many speak up on lists
> such as this, I've learned there's still always a lawyer out there who
> brings up an entirely new way of looking at the license. Some are pretty
> outlandish and still, at this late date, continue to hold to the sort of
> paranoia not seen since the OGL's first days.
>
> Steven Trustrum
> President
>
> Misfit Studios
> http://www.misfit-studios.com
> trustrum@misf...
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ogf-l mailing list
> Ogf-l@mail...
> http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l

_______________________________________________
Ogf-l mailing list
Ogf-l@mail...
http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l

Bookmark with:

Delicious   Digg   reddit   Facebook   StumbleUpon

Related Messages

opensubscriber is not affiliated with the authors of this message nor responsible for its content.