K, seen these? http://www.codeplex.com/OutlookMAPISamples

Kervin Pierre wrote:
>
> You won't need Exchange, so that should help simplify the
> environment.  You won't need to inspect packets either.  You will need
> to inspect assembly.  Are you familiar with MAPI internals at all?  Or
> IDA Pro and Assembly Language?
>
>  
>
> I really only ever used a CalDAV server for testing.  We can use
> Bedework ( http://bedework.com/ ) for this.
>
>  
>
> If you plan on working on migrating the datalayer to C#, then you
> won't need a server at all.  All the testing can be done locally.
>
>  
>
> If you plan to work on shared folders support then you will need IDA
> Pro and lots, and lots of patience J
>
>  
>
> Unfortunately, there isn't much documentation.  But I will be happy to
> answer any questions you may have.
>
>  
>
>  The role of the datalayer is to save MAPI data.  This is what saves
> appointments and messages to the disk.  It is only used by a very
> small number of interfaces.  Actually IMAPIProp
> (http://otlkcon.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/otlkcon/trunk/otlkcon/opncon/O_IProp.cpp?view=markup
> ) and IMAPITable being the biggest consumers.  Currently, it uses an
> SQLite database.  We should move this to SQL Server Compact for better
> locking, application transaction model and more support for platform
> database abstraction features.
>
>  
>
> Again, feel free to ask as many questions as you'd like.  I will try
> to clarify things as best as I can.
>
>  
>
> Best regards,
>
> Kervin
>
>