On 05.09.2011 16:14, Artur Frysiak wrote:
> 2011/9/5 Elan Ruusamäe<glen@pld-...>:
>> On 01.09.2011 22:17, Artur Frysiak wrote:
>>> 2011/9/1 Elan Ruusamäe<glen@delf...>:
>>>> On 09/01/2011 12:55 PM, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
>>>>> Don't "+1", someone just do it 8-)
>>>> this is a bit more difficult that it may seem at first sight.
>>>>
>>>> if keeping it in util-linux.spec, removing from SysVinit.spec and
>>>> upstart-SysVinit.spec, then in which package it exactly go?
>>> To mount package.
>> any explanation to came?
> No :-) Just wild guess.
ok, seems version provided by util-linux depends on libmount:

$ ldd ~/tmp/util-linux-2.20-root-glen/bin/mountpoint
         linux-vdso.so.1 =>  (0x00007fff72ac0000)
         libmount.so.1 => not found
         libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00000033a8800000)
         /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00000033a8400000)

as opposed to one provided in sysvinit
$ ldd /bin/mountpoint
         linux-vdso.so.1 =>  (0x00007fffa97ff000)
         libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00007fef451c0000)
         /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007fef4554f000)

and seems mount pkg is the right place
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/sysvinit-devel/2011-06/msg00010.html

--
glen

_______________________________________________
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@list...
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en