opensubscriber
   Find in this group all groups
 
Unknown more information…

s : syslog-sec@www.employees.org 27 September 2005 • 1:43AM -0400

RE: [Syslog-sec] Implementations of syslog-protocol?
by aokmians

REPLY TO AUTHOR
 
REPLY TO GROUP




For new syslog protocol, so far, we only have a mapping for straight udp. That I am aware of, anyway...

Anton.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: syslog-sec-bounces@will...
> [mailto:syslog-sec-bounces@will...] On Behalf
> Of Darren Reed
> Sent: Monday, September 26, 2005 12:29 PM
> To: Chris Lonvick [clonvick@cisc...]
> Cc: syslog-sec@empl...
> Subject: Re: [Syslog-sec] Implementations of syslog-protocol?
>
>
> This may not be particularly relevant to the question you
> asked, but....
>
> When I've talked about the new syslog protocols to people the
> main issue I hear brought up is "Why is BEEP involved?",
> followed by various amounts of expletives, etc, as they see
> it as an over engineered solution for a very simple problem.
>
> Darren
> _______________________________________________
> Syslog-sec mailing list
> Syslog-sec@www....
> http://www.employees.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog-sec
>
_______________________________________________
Syslog-sec mailing list
Syslog-sec@www....
http://www.employees.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog-sec

Bookmark with:

Delicious   Digg   reddit   Facebook   StumbleUpon

Related Messages

opensubscriber is not affiliated with the authors of this message nor responsible for its content.