opensubscriber
   Find in this group all groups
 
Unknown more information…

u : uug-list@uug.byu.edu 1 June 2012 • 11:56AM -0400

[uug] Waiting on an I/O hog
by Phillip Hellewell

REPLY TO AUTHOR
 
REPLY TO GROUP




Hi all,

Long-time UUG lurker here.  I've pretty much solved my problem already, but I
wanted to post this for posterity and I do have one big question still.

I set up a box with Debian Squeeze: a nice RAID 10 setup with 8 drives.  I
discovered that during heavy I/O writes the system would become very
unresponsive, for example, freezing for up to a minute when saving a small
file.  I was able to reproduce this with cp, dd, or even scp.

In iotop I noticed that kjournald and flush-8:0 were at 99.99%.  Then I
reinstalled with ext4 instead of ext3, but the problem still occurred just with
jbd2 instead of kjournald.  Sadly, running the background copy operation with
an idle I/O priority (using ionice) didn't help.

So I created a partition with JFS and it worked great!  Then I set up one with
XFS and that worked well too!

But I was still curious to find out why ext3/ext4 behaved so badly.  In the
back of my mind I was thinking about the infamous ext3 fsync issue that plagued
especially Firefox users, so I read this article, http://lwn.net/Articles/328363/
and decided to try adding the mount option data=writeback.  That fixed it!

(I know data=writeback is not as safe as data=ordered, but I think it will be
enough for me especially if I do regular backups of important stuff.)

Has anyone else run into this and did you resolve it by switching to
data=writeback or by using a different filesystem like JFS or XFS?

Now for my most important question.  I know that the default for ext3 was
changed to data=writeback, except that Debian (and other distros) override that
by setting the CONFIG_EXT3_DEFAULTS_TO_ORDERED.  (See https://ext4.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Ext3_Data%3DOrdered_vs_Data%3DWriteback_mode).
But what about ext4?  If I read the code correctly, it defaults to ordered, but
why?  To me that says that the kernel devs believe that ext4 does not have the
same problem as ext3, but for me it does!

Phillip

--
Phillip Hellewell <sshock AT sshock.net>
--------------------
BYU Unix Users Group
http://uug.byu.edu/

The opinions expressed in this message are the responsibility of their
author.  They are not endorsed by BYU, the BYU CS Department or BYU-UUG.
___________________________________________________________________
List Info (unsubscribe here): http://uug.byu.edu/mailman/listinfo/uug-list

Bookmark with:

Delicious   Digg   reddit   Facebook   StumbleUpon

Related Messages

opensubscriber is not affiliated with the authors of this message nor responsible for its content.