opensubscriber
   Find in this group all groups
 
Unknown more information…

w : web-sig@python.org 4 January 2011 • 7:13AM -0500

[Web-SIG] Declaring PEP 3333 accepted (was: PEP 444 != WSGI 2.0)
by Jacob Kaplan-Moss

REPLY TO AUTHOR
 
REPLY TO GROUP




On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 9:21 AM, Guido van Rossum <guido@pyth...> wrote:
> Although [PEP 3333] is still marked as draft, I personally think of it
> as accepted; [...]

What does it take to get PEP 3333 formally marked as accepted? Is
there anything I can do to push that process forward?

The lack of a WSGI answer on Py3 is the main thing that's keeping me,
personally, from feeling excited about the platform. Once that's done
I can feel comfortable coding to it -- and browbeating those who don't
support it.

I understand that PEP 444/Web3/WSGI 2/whatever might be a better
answer, but it's clearly got some way to go. In the meantime, what's
next to get PEP 3333 officially endorsed and accepted?

Jacob
_______________________________________________
Web-SIG mailing list
Web-SIG@pyth...
Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig
Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/subscriber%40opensubscriber.com

Bookmark with:

Delicious   Digg   reddit   Facebook   StumbleUpon

Related Messages

opensubscriber is not affiliated with the authors of this message nor responsible for its content.