On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 12:13 AM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss <jacob@jaco...> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 9:21 AM, Guido van Rossum <guido@pyth...> wrote:
>> Although [PEP 3333] is still marked as draft, I personally think of it
>> as accepted; [...]
>
> What does it take to get PEP 3333 formally marked as accepted? Is
> there anything I can do to push that process forward?
>
> The lack of a WSGI answer on Py3 is the main thing that's keeping me,
> personally, from feeling excited about the platform. Once that's done
> I can feel comfortable coding to it -- and browbeating those who don't
> support it.
>
> I understand that PEP 444/Web3/WSGI 2/whatever might be a better
> answer, but it's clearly got some way to go. In the meantime, what's
> next to get PEP 3333 officially endorsed and accepted?
>
> Jacob

I we pep3333 is considered accepted, I will start the port of gunicorn
based on it too. It shouldn't be hard since we are using our own http
parser.

- benoit
_______________________________________________
Web-SIG mailing list
Web-SIG@pyth...
Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig
Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/subscriber%40opensubscriber.com