opensubscriber
   Find in this group all groups
 
Unknown more information…

w : web-sig@python.org 7 January 2011 • 1:58PM -0500

Re: [Web-SIG] Declaring PEP 3333 accepted (was: PEP 444 != WSGI 2.0)
by Guido van Rossum

REPLY TO AUTHOR
 
REPLY TO GROUP




On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 9:47 PM, James Y Knight <foom@fuhm...> wrote:
> On Jan 6, 2011, at 11:30 PM, P.J. Eby wrote:
>> At 09:51 AM 1/7/2011 +1100, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
>>> Is that the last thing or do I need to go spend some time and write my
>>> own CGI/WSGI bridge for Python 3 based on my own Python 2 one I have
>>> lying around and just do some final validation checks with a parallel
>>> implementation as a sanity check to make sure we got everything? This
>>> might be a good idea anyway.
>>
>> It would.  In the meantime, though, I've checked in the two-line change to add .buffer in.  ;-)
>
> So does that mean PEP 3333 can be accepted now?

TBH I've totally lost track. Hopefully PJE and Graham can tell you...

--
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
_______________________________________________
Web-SIG mailing list
Web-SIG@pyth...
Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig
Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/subscriber%40opensubscriber.com

Bookmark with:

Delicious   Digg   reddit   Facebook   StumbleUpon

Related Messages

opensubscriber is not affiliated with the authors of this message nor responsible for its content.