On 2011-01-10 13:12:57 -0800, Guido van Rossum said:
> Ok, now that we've had a week of back and forth about this, let me > repeat my "threat". Unless more concerns are brought up in the next 24 > hours, can PEP 3333 be accepted?
+9001 (> 9000)
> It seems a lot of people are waiting for a decision that enables > implementers to go ahead and claim PEP > 333 compatibility.
Django, mod_wsgi, CherryPy, etc. all have solutions that would need AFIK minor tweaking before going "live", which would make adoption of PEP 3333 the fastest of any PEP I've ever seen. ;)
> PEP 444 can take longer.
Indeed it will! :D
I have the conversion from Textile to ReST about half completed; I'll continue to poke it now that mailing list traffic seems to have died down and won't be consuming the majority of my Copious Spare Time™. ReST just doesn't jive with my neural net. :/