Felix Blyakher wrote:
> I don't think it's pushing too much. XFS was designed to
> survive such events.
And that was my understanding, based on all I've read about the design and intended usage. XFS has been remarkably resilient in the face of various poor operating conditions, and this is the only environment under which failure has been observed. It's for this reason that I assumed it's something we're doing wrong, and not an inherent issue with the file system.