clang found this one too as a "Dead assignment"

Unless my pointer-fu is totally messed up, this function
was never actually updating the list head.

This would mean that the later free_allocations() calls in
incore_ext_teardown() and free_rt_dup_extent_tree() don't
actually free more than one item, and therefore leak memory.

Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sand...>
---

clang record:
http://sandeen.net/clang/xfsprogs/2009-09-09-1/report-1Jnl15.html#EndPath

diff --git a/repair/incore.c b/repair/incore.c
index 84626c9..77f4630 100644
--- a/repair/incore.c
+++ b/repair/incore.c
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ void
record_allocation(ba_rec_t *addr, ba_rec_t *list)
{
addr->next = list;
- list = addr;
+ *list = addr;

return;
}

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss....
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs